Video streaming records broken for the Royal Wedding

Tuesday, May 3rd, 2011

A variety of Internet firms have stated that online video streaming records have been broken over the course of the UK’s recent royal wedding.

“The royal wedding has broken records for the biggest ever live streaming audience online, according to a internet firms.

The BBC website meanwhile wobbled under the strain this morning as huge numbers of Britons accessed its coverage.

Visitors were intermittently greeted with an error message saying the website was experiencing “abnormal traffic” around the climax of the ceremony after 11am.

A spokesman said: “We are experiencing some technical issues with BBC Online due to the sheer weight of traffic, which may cause the site to be slower than normal in some cases.”

Other major websites appeared to be cope with the royal wedding, an event that was widely expected to break traffic records.

YouTube’s live stream, which was expected to attract 400 million viewers, ran smoothly.

Akamai, a major traffic carrier, said that its own record of 1.6 million concurrent live streams during the World Cup was broken.

And Livestream, which provided online video for the Associated Press and CBS, also said the royal wedding was its most popular stream ever.

It is likely to take several days before a complete picture of how many watched the royal wedding online emerges, however.

Network upgrades by mobile operators along the royal wedding route were successful in ensuring that well-wishers were able to call, text, tweet and update Facebook.

O2 and Vodafone installed temporary network base stations around Hyde Park and St James’ Park to double capacity. A spokesman for O2 said it was braced for 65 million royal wedding pictures to be posted online from smartphones.”

The Telegraph

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Slashdot
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Reddit

Will the Apple iPad slow development of mobile websites?

Thursday, February 4th, 2010

Apple iPad TabletWill Apple’s release of the iPad slow the surge past few years of mobile web development? Some people think so.

The release of Apple’s ever popular smartphone, the iPhone, back in mid 2007 caused a huge development spike in websites and dynamic web applications designed the mobile devices. Of course, the vast majority of these mobile website were developed specifically with the iPhone in mind, however the results were beneficial to pretty much all smartphones with the capability the browse the web and with some form of web browser application.

So, why do I think the iPad will slow this development in the mobile web market? The iPad is a mobile device itself is it not?

Well, perhaps not. Apple’s iPad does indeed use an operating system very similar to the iPhone, with backwards compatibility with almost all of the iPhone’s downloadable apps, and yes, it is mobile in the true sense of the word – it can be easily carried around unlike a full desktop computer and much more easily than a typically larger and much heavier laptop. However, the one aspect of the iPad which stands out is its native screen resolution of 1024×768. This means that, since most web developers design, template and style their websites for resolutions of either 800×600 or 1024×768, normal websites look fantastic on the iPad.

Why build an iPad specific ‘mobile’ version of a website when your existing site works perfectly, fills the screen and looks fantastic?

A lot of web developers will find no need to. However, sites that use heavy amounts of Flash content may be required to rethink their design and implementation strategy when it comes to Flash websites on Apple products. This is because the neither the iPhone or the iPad, at time of writing, support Flash in websites and so rely more so on the ever increasing use of interactive JavaScript elements via programming technologies such as AJAX.

If you’re interested in getting a design done for Apple products, be it the iPhone, iPad or just any Macintosh system, take a look at our website’s web design section. Hopefully it will spike your interest.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Slashdot
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Reddit

What is a Smartphone? Myths and legends…

Friday, November 6th, 2009

Nokia 7110I’ve been trying to get some clarity on what defines a ‘Smartphone’ and the true answer is…nobody knows! Its just a made up phrase by someone in the industry. Some believe that a Smartphone simply allows the use of Email and Internet. Ok looking into this further I see the first phone which allowed this functionality, using WAP, was the Nokia 7110 Dual Band GSM 900/1800 which was first seen in 1999! So if you’re still the proud owner of one of these antiques then you have yourself the very first, by some definitions, Smartphone…Congratulations.

Although this still isn’t good enough for me, if I go into a mobile phone shop and ask to see a range of Smartphones what would I be shown? Well searching for ‘Smartphones’ on the net turns up some varied and interesting results. The top 3 sponsored links display the Motorola Dext, BlackBerry Smartphones and the all new Palm Pre so I think we need to look at the common factors (I’m only using these as examples as they are the first to display, personally I’m waiting for my HTC HD2 to drop through the post any day now, ye-haw).

Firstly I was hoping that all of them are touch screen, but a lot of Blackberrys are not – yet they are still referred to as Smartphones. The plot thickens. The next thing I approached is the ability to use the myriad of different social networks at the touch of a button, Facebook, Twitter, Bebo, My Space etc. Motorola listed this as one of its key features as did the Blackberry but I noticed a lot of Palm Pre users frustrated at the lack of an app for Facebook – so still pulling up short on what defines a ‘Smartphone’. It has to be unification in operating systems for phones but I know this isn’t true without even skimming the net.

Other definitions you may enjoy:

  • ‘A ‘Smartphone’ is a mobile phone offering advanced capabilities, often with PC-like functionality.’
  • ‘Electronic handheld device that integrates the functionality of a mobile phone, personal digital assistant (PDA) or other information appliance.’ – This pretty much describes a laptop using Skype.
  • ‘A generic name for voice centric mobile phones with information capability’ – this seems more realistic but we’re back to almost any mobile phone ever made!

Well I guess if ‘Smartphone’ is just made up corperate language to sell more PDA’s which you can also make phone calls on I guess I’ll go and run some ideas up a flagpole using some sky blue thinking to make sure all my ducks are in line…

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Slashdot
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Reddit