Net Neutrality Fears from the ‘creator of the web’

Tuesday, April 19th, 2011

The inventor of the web has said that governments must act to preserve the principle of net neutrality.

Sir Tim Berners-Lee told the BBC that legislation may be needed if self-regulation failed.

He been asked by the UK government to negotiate an agreement on an open internet between service providers and content firms like the BBC and Skype.

Sir Tim would prefer self-regulation by the internet industry, but progress has been slow.

“If it fails the government has to be absolutely ready to legislate,” he said.

“It may be that the openness of the internet, we should just put into law.”

Net neutrality, the idea that all traffic on the internet should be treated equally, has been a controversial issue in the United States and is now moving up the political agenda in the UK.

Net neutrality is an important issue in Internet related politics. Without net neutrality, Internet service providers could offer packages in which certain online services, such as video streaming websites, e-commerce websites or certain web applications have increased priority over other web services.

The concept of net neutrality is such that all data traffic on the Internet is treating in an equal manner.  This is already becoming an issue in the case of Internet services providers which shape traffic of certain types. This is often done to curb data usage for high-use customers. However, when other traffic is prioritised and ISP to Internet/web company partnerships come into existence, this could mean that we see ‘packages’ of Internet access which allow faster access to certain websites while leaving other sites (who may not be able to partner with ISP financially) out in the cold.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Slashdot
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Reddit

What is a Smartphone? Myths and legends…

Friday, November 6th, 2009

Nokia 7110I’ve been trying to get some clarity on what defines a ‘Smartphone’ and the true answer is…nobody knows! Its just a made up phrase by someone in the industry. Some believe that a Smartphone simply allows the use of Email and Internet. Ok looking into this further I see the first phone which allowed this functionality, using WAP, was the Nokia 7110 Dual Band GSM 900/1800 which was first seen in 1999! So if you’re still the proud owner of one of these antiques then you have yourself the very first, by some definitions, Smartphone…Congratulations.

Although this still isn’t good enough for me, if I go into a mobile phone shop and ask to see a range of Smartphones what would I be shown? Well searching for ‘Smartphones’ on the net turns up some varied and interesting results. The top 3 sponsored links display the Motorola Dext, BlackBerry Smartphones and the all new Palm Pre so I think we need to look at the common factors (I’m only using these as examples as they are the first to display, personally I’m waiting for my HTC HD2 to drop through the post any day now, ye-haw).

Firstly I was hoping that all of them are touch screen, but a lot of Blackberrys are not – yet they are still referred to as Smartphones. The plot thickens. The next thing I approached is the ability to use the myriad of different social networks at the touch of a button, Facebook, Twitter, Bebo, My Space etc. Motorola listed this as one of its key features as did the Blackberry but I noticed a lot of Palm Pre users frustrated at the lack of an app for Facebook – so still pulling up short on what defines a ‘Smartphone’. It has to be unification in operating systems for phones but I know this isn’t true without even skimming the net.

Other definitions you may enjoy:

  • ‘A ‘Smartphone’ is a mobile phone offering advanced capabilities, often with PC-like functionality.’
  • ‘Electronic handheld device that integrates the functionality of a mobile phone, personal digital assistant (PDA) or other information appliance.’ – This pretty much describes a laptop using Skype.
  • ‘A generic name for voice centric mobile phones with information capability’ – this seems more realistic but we’re back to almost any mobile phone ever made!

Well I guess if ‘Smartphone’ is just made up corperate language to sell more PDA’s which you can also make phone calls on I guess I’ll go and run some ideas up a flagpole using some sky blue thinking to make sure all my ducks are in line…

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Slashdot
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Reddit